All photos were Photoshopped to my liking at the time of scanning, and my liking does vary over time. The Plustek scan is always first in each pair. I’ll share a scan from each roll here from the Plustek, and for black and white a scan from the Scan Dual II, and for color a scan from the lab’s scanner. I scanned strips of Fomapan 200, T-Max 100, Kodak Max 400, Fujicolor 200, and 50-year-expired GAF 125, aka Ansco Versapan. I just stuck with VueScan, which recognized the Plustek instantly. I used to use it with my old Epson flatbed and found it to be so cumbersome as to be unpleasant. My Plustek came with SilverFast scanning software, but I didn’t install or use it. Holy cow, is the Plustek blazing fast compared to the Scan Dual II! I scanned a strip in the Plustek from each of the last five rolls of film I shot. She had heard me lament the long scan times I was experiencing with my otherwise acceptable Minolta Scan Dual II and decided to help a film photographer out. Good luck.My wife bought me a Plustek OpticFilm 8200i SE scanner for Christmas. Don’t agonize over the results, but do compare several different images and then choose the software you like best (combination of ease of use and color results). You should try your Nikon software as well. You have to do tests with each software’s film profiles for a few different images, as color results are highly dependent on these profiles. I have not done many negatives, but so far I prefer Vuescan to Polaroid for negs. This focuses my learning curve investment into PS. I prefer to do very limited adjustments at scan time (mainly small cropping, & set white/black points), then do all the rest in Photoshop. For me, Silverfast has too many options, as if trying to scan + Photoshop in one. Polaroid shipped Silverfast along with their software, and I tried both as well as Vuescan, and prefer Polaroid’s interface and color results for my many Kodachrome slides. I use Vuescan for flatbed scans as superior to Epson’s software. I have a Polaroid 4000 slide/neg scanner and an Epson flatbed. I hope this helps, any further questions please ask!! of times you have to put what can be delicate slides through a scanner.Īs far as I’m aware, Vuescan supports both of your scanners so you should be able to get consistent results and even compare the 35mm capabilities of both scanners (something I would be interested in!!). It also has a very useful feature whereby you can make a raw scan, and then effectively re-scan from the RAW file. If you get Vuescan, get the pro-edition, it unlocks all the options and also allows you unlimited updates. I found these very useful for old Kodachrome slides up to 40 or so years old. The user interface is basic, but has a lot of options to tweak results. I’ve used it now on hundreds of slides and negatives and can get excellent results from it. I only use Vuescan for negative/slide scanning as it doesn’t support my old and not very good HP flatbed scanner. However, I just could not get on with the interface at all, so ended up choosing VueScan!! I can’t comment too much on Silverfast as I only tried the demo version while evaluating which software to use myself. But I would like to hear your experiences with these two products. My reading seems to indicate that VueScan is better for negatives and slides, while SliverFast is better for photographs. I’m scanning photographs with an Epson Perfection 4870. I’m scanning slides and negatives with a Nikon CoolScan V. I’d like to know which product is best for 35mm slides, 50-year-old black and white negatives, 4×6 photographs, etc. Wrote in message I’m seeking comments from people who have used both SilverFast and VueScan. Not to be "uttering any disparaging words" … but I’ve seen people characterizing ViewScan as "a rolling Beta" …whatever that means. (2) You can set the White Point, Black Point, and Middle Gray with a probe-like capability. I currently prefer SilverFast AI … primarily because I’m more comfortable working with its UI *and* because it actually has I have tried both, and also EpsonScan, on an Epson Perfection 4870 for very similar tasks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |